By Norman Eisenberg, High
Fidelity Magazine, April 1965
Northward from London's Hyde Park runs Queensway,
a busy but tidy thoroughfare of retail shops, among which,
at No. 100, is a unique musical - audio diggings. Here, after
walking up one flight, a visitor finds himself in a clubby
sort of room lined with audio equipment, shelves of records,
and several speaker systems flanking a fireplace. The place
suggested to me less a business establishment than some private
collector's den - an impression reinforced by its name, "Music
in the Home," and by the avowed policy of its owner,
Thomas Heinitz ("We are a studio rather than a shop;
my clients are music lovers rather than sound fanatics.").
This being a Saturday forenoon, Heinitz had set up rows of
folding chairs and was selecting a group of albums for his
weekly "live record review" at which new releases
are played and discussed. These sessions, free of charge,
are naturally intended to stimulate interest in both records
and equipment, and Heinitz has found that stereo in particular
"evokes an interest never before evident - in the very
sound of the instruments, the seating of the players, and
so on."
In this carefully de-commercialised environment,
it is plain that "selling" is no more important
than other functions: counselling on music and equipment,
advice on home installation, competent servicing when needed,
and - perhaps above all - the creation of an atmosphere that
does not make a visitor feel guilty for having neglected to
bring his check book. To be sure, Heinitz's operation is a
rarity, even in England. (A ten - minute ride on the Underground
brings one to the frankly commercial atmosphere of a "dealer's
row" along Tottenham Court Road to the vicinity of New
Oxford Street. Here sits Imhof's, an eight - story audio department
store where you can buy anything from a tape - cleaning kit
to a stereo console.) But Heinitz's "studio" for
me somehow epitomized the literate, urbane, music - oriented
and quality - minded British audio field in general. It is
a field that has an identity, a style - one more clearly discernible
than our own; it is actually an "establishment"
in terms of products, personalities, and prevailing attitudes.
This character is particularly striking
in that Britain has no formal organization comparable to our
own Institute of High Fidelity. It is understandable, however,
in extra-industry terms. For one thing, history and tradition
lend a sense of continuity and permanence to most activity.
This sense, in turn, makes for a certain calmness, and a pace
that may seem slower than ours but is no less effective in
accomplishing its own ends. History surrounds you, of course,
in the vaulted environs of Westminster Abbey, or on the moors
near Ilkley. But even audio, a very young field, also has
its history, a consciousness of links with the technical accomplishments
of the past and of its role in current music and cultural
activity. What's more, tradition has a way of asserting itself
in the context of today's affairs. For instance, you have
lunch with Donald Chave of Lowther at the Tiger's Head in
Kent, and learn that Francis Bacon is buried in Chislehurst
Parish Church across the road (a group of researchers, hoping
to prove a connection between Bacon and Shakespeare, recently
dug up the grave, found nothing but sand, and repaired to
the Tiger's Head to feed and water their frustration). Or,
you visit the workshop of Cecil E. Watts - and you find it
in the basement of a house built by Christopher Wren. Someone
casually remarks that the original Garrard organization was
an offshoot of the crown jewellers. You learn that the pedal
bass of the organ in Westminster Abbey was heard in open air
for the first time when, at the coronation of Elizabeth II,
Tannoy "wired Trafalgar Square for sound" with a
1-kilowatt system loaded down to 30 cycles per second.
In general, the British audio industry,
despite natural competition among members, has a strong sense
of professionalism and an abounding pride in the "audio
fraternity." It is not unusual for company officials
to praise the work of other key men, even when the latter
are employed by rival firms. It also was not unusual, during
my series of visits, for competing firms to help me get from
one to the other. Thus, Leak drove me to Truvox, Lowther drove
me to Tannoy, Goodmans drove me to Jordan - Watts, Jordan
- Watts drove me to EMI. An interesting variation on this
procedure occurred in Yorkshire, where Wharfedale and Sugden
agreed that the one would pick me up at Bradford station and
the other carry me from my hotel to the station at departure
time. And just about everyone else either collected me at,
or delivered me to, bus and train stops.
Geography also lends a tone to England's
audio establishment. Quite small in proportion to the tremendous
activity it contains, the country's very physical limits encourage
a unity that transcends intermittent internal disagreements.
This unity, however, does not decay into insularity; British
audio men, like Britons generally, are eager world travellers,
and most whom I met already have visited our country as well
as Europe and the Orient, or indeed continue to do so regularly.
An influx of foreigners complements the flow outward, and
Britain - as much as or more than the U.S.A. - is truly a
melting pot: visit any plant from Yorkshire to Sussex and
you probably will meet Indians, Africans, Orientals, Europeans
(even an occasional Yank!) working side by side with native
Britons.
Finally, there is Britain's changing economy.
"No one here can make a personal fortune any more,"
I was told, "but no one will starve either." In
the general economic leavening and levelling that have taken
place there is less incentive for small - scale production
of prestige items and a growing impetus towards quantity production
of lower - priced but nonetheless reliable equipment. At the
lowest price levels, the British call these products their
"cheap and cheerful" lines. "Cheap and dirty"
items (i.e., shoddy goods) are, on the other hand, universally
deplored. While prestige products or "state of the art"
equipment are not very significant as marketing factors, their
superiority is widely acknowledged, and their development
encouraged. The prevailing product design philosophy, then,
is that prototypes of excellence exist, and the job is to
approximate their quality as closely as possible in necessarily
lower - cost models. "We start from the top, and try
to design our way down - and not too far down at that,"
said one company official; "the chaps who start at the
lowest rung of quality simply don't get very far over here."
Indeed, British audio manufacturing is basically engineer-oriented,
and a manufacturer would no sooner deliberately downgrade
his product or "let the advertising department write
our specifications" than he would dream of serving tea
without milk or cream.
My fortnight of tea and technicana began,
logically enough, in the London area where most of Britain's
high fidelity manufacturers and its two major record companies
- EMI and Decca - are located. My itinerary about, and from,
London of necessity omitted several firms; to cover them all
would have required much more than the two weeks at my disposal.
As it was, I travelled about eight hundred miles to visit
a score of places, and perhaps three times that number of
individuals. One of my first journeys was made on a London
bus, a double-decker that carried me across the Thames to
Blackfriars Road, just beyond what was once the legal boundary
of London. I was reminded of the days when Shakespeare and
his company staged their plays outside the city limits. Today
the area is mainly given to light industry, though the Old
Vic stands in the district as a reminder of its past. I had
not been able to get tickets for Olivier's Othello, but my
play-going interests were at least in part satisfied by my
meeting with R. W. Merrick, managing director of the tape
recorder firm Ferrograph and a man whose resemblance to a
certain British film actor is complemented by a flair for
vigorous projection of ideas. "We make our own motors,
tape heads, chassis; we even mould our own knobs," he
told me; "we produce exactly the kind of tape machine
we believe in." Merrick has little use, from a high quality
standpoint, for either tape cartridges or slow speeds. As
for such features as automatic reverse, "it's another
gadget, the more of which inevitably means greater servicing
problems." He did point out, however, that Ferrograph
machines can accept an 8¼ inch diameter reel which,
when loaded with long - play tape, "should give adequate,
uninterrupted time for most home tape uses. "Video tape?"
I can't see why a home needs it, but that could be said about
many things." In any case, Ferrograph will not "make
a machine that must use the 'brute force' approach, such as
120-ips speed or rotating heads," though if slower speeds
become feasible, the company will look into that area. As
for transistors, Mr. Merrick's remarks were terse: "You
can't get reliable ones in sufficient quantity yet to justify
changing over from valves (vacuum tubes)."
With this product philosophy, Merrick does
not expect the mass market to queue up at his doorstep. Nor
does he see his typical customer, any more, as the "old
audio nut, the kind who would crawl on all fours at the Audio
fairs."
Ferrograph's customers are what Merrick
calls the "mezzo hi-fi fans, who don't know all the jargon
but who do appreciate what high quality tape can give them."
Ferrograph's intransigence, while not the sole rationale guiding
all British manufacturers, does figure in much of what is
produced and seems to be echoed quite strongly by at least
two well-known neighbours to the north and south. A little
over an hour's train ride gets you to Huntingdon where, past
the town itself, is a modern industrial area composed of several
low-slung buildings looking like any analogous area in the
U.S.A. One of these is the home of Acoustical Manufacturing,
makers of the Quad electrostatic speaker, the first full-range
system of its class to have been offered commercially. Peter
J. Walker, its designer and head of the company, told me that
the Quad's following is limited, but growing steadily. The
basic design has not changed in recent years, although "we
constantly try to improve things, particularly in the midrange,
which is, to us, the area most important for a natural projection
of sound." Walker seemed satisfied with the Quad's low
end: "We are not concerned about the bass as such."
Walker similarly is satisfied with the Quad
amplifier and is doubtful about its going solid-state. "To
produce an amplifier with transistors that would give the
same performance as our valve models would require 30% increase
in cost," he explained. In common with many British manufacturers,
Walker was amused at the high power ratings ascribed to some
American equipment. An amplifier, he pointed out, may have
an actual RMS value of 10 watts per channel when measured
at low distortion and with a normal line voltage input. By
such techniques as allowing more distortion, increasing the
line voltage, taking peak rather than RMS values - and finally
doubling everything for stereo - the basic figure of 10 watts
can be inflated to 80 or even 100 watts. "We rate our
amplifiers at the lowest distortion possible and operating
under the most unfavourable power supply conditions. Actually,
our 15-watt unit could easily be labelled a 44-watter (22
watts per channel) if we relaxed some of our test conditions,"
Walker concluded.
A somewhat longer trip south from London
brings you to Steyning, in Sussex, a carefully preserved village
in which a centuries-old atmosphere has not been disturbed
by the proximity of the sparkling new SME plant on its outskirts.
The company was founded in 1946 as a precision-engineering
firm doing contract work, and its first orders were for Scaled
Model Equipment (from whence the letters SME). In 1959, Director
A. Robertson-Aikman, a long-time audiophile, felt that he
wanted a pickup arm better than anything commercially available
- and proceeded to build it. Today the company turns out two
hundred arms a week, and Mr. Robertson-Aikman personally inspects
each one. The basic design is still the same, but refinements
have been added - a lightweight shell to accommodate ultrahigh-compliance
cartridges, a movable end-cap to extend the balancing range
and thus provide the lowest inertia with any cartridge, an
odd-shaped board to fit the arm more satisfactorily to a Thorens
turntable.
An audio perfectionist at home as well as
at his works, Robertson-Aikman has built his own speaker systems.
Each one uses an Ionovac tweeter crossed over at 3,500 cps
to an EMI elliptical woofer installed in a nine-cubic-foot
enclosure made of 1½ inch-thick reinforced concrete.
The enclosures are stuffed with Fiberglas and covered with
oak veneer to make them acceptable in the living room.
If such companies as Ferrograph, Acoustical
Manufacturing, and SME serve a specialized interest within
high fidelity, most British manufacturers, like our own, operate
in a broader spectrum. That is to say, they offer variations
of one generic class of equipment, or they produce different
types of equipment. A few are expanding in both directions.
A prime example of the first type is Garrard, probably the
largest manufacturer of record-playing machinery in the world.
Headquarters and main works are located in Swindon, Wiltshire,
about seventy miles west of London, a town known primarily
as a rail centre and a seat of bicycle manufacture. The Garrard
works are so spread out that they must be covered on wheels.
With this industrial complex, plus other plants elsewhere
in England and distribution from Bangkok to Brooklyn, it can
be said that the sun never sets on Garrard. In the company
of Director Thomas H. Pritchard, I made the grand tour of
the Swindon plants, met engineer E. W. Mortimer, who in 1932
built its first changer (the RC-1), inspected this model still
proudly kept on hand, and generally stretched my legs across
the acres of diversified and complex works. Garrard does "everything"
for itself, from making the segments of a motor to stamping
out parts on a 300-ton press. Actually Garrard produces a
wide variety of record-playing gear, including the refined
and improved automatics best known to Americans as well as
changers and manual turntables for other markets. In all,
some three thousand people are employed, including sixty to
eighty apprentices who receive paid on-the-job training as
well as free courses at a technical college and who form a
manpower pool for future engineering and supervisory talent.
Some of the speaker manufacturers, such
as Goodmans, also produce a "vertical" line of one
basic type of equipment. Most of the companies known to Americans
for their speakers, however, manufacture other components,
or are about to do so. For instance, Tannoy produces stereo
cartridges and a comprehensive series of public address and
studio gear; Wharfedale soon will launch its own solid-state
amplifiers and tuners; Lowther offers solid-state control
preamps and tube amplifiers. In contrast, at least one new
company, Jordan - Watts, will take a unique "economy-specialist"
path by offering a loudspeaker cell or module that may be
used alone or may be combined with other modules for wider
response and greater power-handling ability. (The J-W units
are represented in England by Boosey and Hawkes, a company
long associated with musical instruments and well known as
music publishers; they may be distributed in the U.S.A. later
this year.) A host of lesser-known (in the U.S.A.) companies
- such as Armstrong, Rogers, Goldring, R & A, Radford,
and Brenell - are quite active in components ("separates")
for the home market.
The major British record companies have
equipment - manufacturing divisions. EMI's amplifiers and
speakers will continue to be produced, together with a new
phono pickup system and a new tape recorder, in a gigantic
works to be started in Wales. EMI, incidentally, expressed
relatively high hopes for a tape cartridge system operating
at l 7/8 ips speed but neither "as complex nor as costly
as any system we've had so far." Decca is bringing out
both console sets and separate components, the former sleekly
styled in teakwood and metal, the latter including a solid-state
control amplifier. A new version of its "summation"
cartridge, to fit any tone arm, is expected, as well as an
improved model of the Kelly ribbon tweeter, fitted with an
acoustical lens. Pye, known mainly in the past for its television
sets and consoles, has announced a separate solid-state amplifier.
Among the names especially familiar to Americans,
the broadest form of equipment diversification is in progress
at Leak. Now located in a "factory estate" section
of a London suburb, the firm soon will move to a three-hundred-acre
site a hundred miles from London. The main impetus for Leak's
expansion seems to be transistors. Harold J. Leak prefers
them to tubes because "they offer better value for the
same money." A solid-state amplifier, he feels, "can
be made to be smaller, lighter in weight, and to cost about
10 per cent less than a similar tube amplifier" Leak
does not believe that either type necessarily sounds better.
As to test measurements in general: "Higher numbers in
tests, of both tube and transistor amplifiers, often are not
borne out by the results of listening tests - which only indicates
to us that ultimately 'high fidelity' is an art form more
than it is anything else."
In addition to amplifiers and tuners, Leak
continues to produce the Sandwich speaker system (and the
sandwich keeps getting lighter and stiffer), and is planning
to bring out a new turntable, arm, and cartridge. The pickup
will use the moving-iron technique, preferred by Leak because
this design makes it easier to "get the high frequency
resonance out of the audible range."
The Leak organization is thirty years old.
"I started," says Harold Leak, "with $66 in
cash and a test meter." Mr. Leak's attitude towards his
work possibly is well illustrated by his reply to a restaurant
owner who, after we had enjoyed a superb meal, asked him what
he thought of it. Leak answered by telling a story: when he
was a schoolboy, he and his classmates had to do "sums"
that they considered very difficult. "Our reward,"
Leak told the open-mouthed proprietor "was matched to
our accomplishment. For every mistake we received a rap across
the knuckles. For no errors, we were let off with a warning."
Intense interest in solid-state also was
evident at Truvox, a firm which in addition to its speaker
systems and tape recorders is readying a new series of tuners
and amplifiers. Chief Engineer Ron Bishop likes transistors,
but not exactly for the same reasons as Leak. In addition
to such agreed-on advantages as eliminating the output transformer,
lessening the heat problem, facilitating more compact chassis,
Bishop points to the instantaneous overload recovery characteristics
of solid-state amplifiers, a feature that improves transient
response and which many designers feel is the key to that
"clean transistor sound." Bishop allows that "you
can get similar performance from tubes, but it becomes very
costly." Solid-state amplifiers, he pointed out, also
lend themselves to higher damping factors for better control
of speakers. As to "wideband response," Bishop favours
going beyond 20 kc because "the more accurately you re-produce
the highest overtones, the more natural the sound. Limited-band
response can become tiring after a while."
Truvox's newest tape recorder, probably
to be introduced in the U.S.A. later this year, will contain
solid-state circuitry and, among other features, an adjustable
bias control to get best results from all kinds of tape. At
that, Bishop counsels, "it will not be so accessible
as to encourage undue or casual use by the owner." Bishop
feels that 7½ ips is the "standard high fidelity
speed" largely because of its superior signal-to-noise
ratio over 3¾ ips, but he concedes that the slower
speed may eventually rival 7½ ips in s/n ratio and
in response.
As in the U.S.A., speaker design in England
remains the subject of possibly the liveliest disagreement
and the most experimentation in audio. In addition to what
I encountered at the firms mentioned above I learned more
about current British opinion during subsequent visits to
other manufacturers. For instance, Goodmans in Middlesex has
not given up paper as a material completely, Company Director
Peter Collings-Wells told me, but "the tendency now is
to use it as a 'carrier' - to help shape the diaphragm which
itself may be a laminate of paper and plastics. "A definite
trend, Collings-Wells feels, has been towards complete speaker
systems; most people no longer buy individual drivers to install
in their own enclosures. In his view, this relates to a general
lessening of do-it-yourself interest and to the improvements
evident in system design. The new Maxim (Maximus in the U.S.A.)
was developed to conform to this trend, and also to provide
very clean sound within the smallest possible installation
space. As for the general debate on "big versus small"
systems, Collings-Wells is content to let personal taste settle
the matter. "We supply all sizes." A similar listen-and-let-listen
attitude was evident at Tannoy, where Michael H. Fountain
(son of Guy R. Fountain, whose initials designate Tannoy's
enclosures) and T. B. Livingstone agreed that speaker evaluation
is a personal thing and that listening tastes cannot be prejudged
with a slide rule. Tannoy's design approach centres around
"making the treble and bass drivers as good as we can,
and then offering an enclosure to suit acoustical taste."
By way of explanation: "When we visited the U.S.A. years
ago to attend your first audio show, we knew nothing of your
country except that the traffic ran on the wrong side of the
road. Since then, we've learned a good deal more, including
the fact that there are differences in listening tastes between
our two countries."
These differences (which were mentioned
to me by other British audio experts) are subtle, not always
agreed on in their respective countries, and certainly subject
to change. Nonetheless, they have been discerned by many in
listening tests. Tannoy believes, for instance, that the prevailing
taste in the U.S.A. has been for "front-row sound, or
perhaps right-in-the-midst-of-the-orchestra sound." Britishers,
in contrast, prefer a "farther back" sound, more
like listening "through an open door on the concert hall."
On the European Continent, "people like their sound relatively
light, but smooth over-all. Your hi-fi chap on the Continent,
incidentally, fiddles a good deal with his tone controls to
get the sound just as he wants it. Americans - and we Britishers
too for that matter - demand these controls, and then - for
some reason - never use them."
A similar emphasis on the role of the enclosure,
though with a somewhat different twist, was expressed by Donald
M. Chave, director of Lowther. "My aim is to use the
magnet and voice-coil assembly to set up a wave-train rather
than to try to get the driver itself to move all the air needed
for accurate reproduction." The latter function, from
his point of view, is the job of the horn enclosure that is
loaded to the driver. At Lowther, little is left to chance,
or to outside sources, and Chave has built his own machine
for making magnets. He agrees that a valid aim of speaker
design is to try to "reduce size for the same performance,
or to improve performance, in the same size." Accordingly,
Chave experiments as well as manufactures; his latest effort
- still something of a secret and possibly to be patented
- is towards a "high productivity voice-coil related
to an improved magnet." Lowther products, sold in Europe
and in Japan, were once sold in the U.S.A. and may be reintroduced
soon.
For whatever significance it may have in
the mystique of British audio, the production of cylindrical
speaker systems today seems to be confined to a small radius
in Yorkshire where Sugden and Wharfedale are found within
a few miles of each other. But apart from a common interest
in what G. A. Briggs calls "drain pipes," a mutual
pride in the moors and other scenic marvels of the country,
and a wry humour over being unique establishments in the heart
of England's textile region, the two companies are fairly
dissimilar. To begin with, Sugden is one of the few British
companies to designate its products by a tradename (Connoisseur)
rather than by the firm's name. And speakers as such have
not been this firm's main or sole product line. A. R. Sugden
was, in fact, one of the first to demonstrate publicly, in
1956, a stereo disc and pickup, the latter a ceramic type.
Sugden still favours ceramics, although a decade of research
has brought refinements to the original design. The latest
version is made of a "double length" of material
that is cut in half; the sections then are moulded to yield
identical elements for each channel. This new pickup uses
a 0.6 - mil diamond stylus and tracks at a 15-degree angle.
The stylus is replaceable by the owner, and a 78-rpm tip is
available. Sugden also showed me a new arm, which, though
designed primarily for his own cartridge, can accept other
makes as well.
While going through the Sugden works, I
saw the prototype of an unusually designed turntable - a two-speed
model (33 and 45 rpm) in which each speed is selected by its
own hysteresis-synchronous motor. The speed control switch
activates the appropriate motor, which turns the inner rim
of the platter by means of a direct-drive wheel; the motor
not in use swings away under the plinth. Connoisseur products,
like Lowther's, may again become available in the United States
after an absence of some years.
Speakers, of course, have always been the
main concern at Wharfedale, whose founder and head, G. A.
Briggs, is internationally known as a writer and lecturer.
Indeed, Mr. Briggs may well have brought the idea of high
fidelity sound to more people than has any other individual.
Today, at seventy-four, he has, in his own words, "put
health first, work second, and money last." Long-distance
tours are out, but he still lectures and demonstrates closer
to home, is writing a new book, continues to correspond with
enthusiasts the world over, and is in fact very much the managing
director of Wharfedale Wireless Works.
The plant, through which Mr. Briggs conducted
me at a brisk pace, is located in Idle-Bradford, although
the company name is derived from the lovely Wharfe River Valley,
not far away. Briggs's own explanation of the name (in his
book Loudspeakers, 5th edition) is worth repeating. At a demonstration
he was once asked, "... why our speakers were named Wharfedale
when they were made in Bradford, which is in Airedale. I pointed
out that the beauty of Wharfedale matched the beauty of the
product (ahem!) and we could not risk using a name like Airedale
in case dissatisfied customers ... complained that we were
dirty dogs; whereupon a lady observed brightly that we might
at least have adopted Airedale as a suitable name for our
woofers."
Like so many speaker experts, Wharfedale
engineers allow that, beyond a certain point in the design
effort, much of "the beauty of the product" is in
the ear of the listener. They too are aware of differences
in sonic taste, and noticeably between British and American
listeners. These differences, they find, are not a matter
of over-all frequency range or of distortion, but more of
tonal balance or emphasis. Americans, it seems, generally
prefer a more prominent bass, tentatively characterized -
in an impromptu word-searching contest we indulged in - as
"rich" (our economic status?), or as "excessively
warm" (to conform to our central heating?), or as "woolly"
(that textile influence!), or as "pregnant" (this
really signifies reproduction!). One plausible explanation
advanced for the bass preference was the generally larger
size of the average American living room, which would be dimensionally
suited to accept the longer wavelengths of deep bass tones.
Whatever the explanation (and however one describes the differences),
Wharfedale makes an effort to satisfy a wide range of listening
tastes, especially ours, and the result is a fair diversity
of systems. In addition to speakers, Wharfedale is about to
enter solid-state electronics; the forthcoming amplifiers
and tuners will be manufactured in a new plant. Technical
manager Kenneth Russell was very enthusiastic over the possibilities
of solid-state; he favours the new technology for its extended
frequency response and "superior transient characteristics
which will make good speakers sound even better."
What "sound even better" actually
means is perhaps most aptly suggested in a remark of Mr. Briggs's
daughter, Mrs. V. E. Pitehford: in describing what guides
the Wharfedale people in choosing records for their demonstrations,
she pointed to a "strong musical rather than gymnastic
bias...." Indeed, this reaffirmation of "sound for
music's sake" might well sum up the entire British philosophy
of audio which is - when you think on it - not really so different
from our own. |
|